Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Feature Brief

...

  • We considered a more elaborate recommendation system but decided to prioritize data transparency and user control over automated recommendations. So we do not recommend courses in any way.

Include some mocks or a prototype to illustrate the concept. (Add links)

Review Feature Brief before continuing

...

  • Create a dedicated "Grade Distribution Dashboard" easily accessible.

  • Cleanup:

    • Remove box and whisker plots as it is confusing for the user.

    • The number of grades displayed is not accessible. User has to look a lot to find the number.

  • Dashboard:

    • Aggregate and display historical grade distribution data for courses and professors.

    • Display the number of grades or number of students who enrolled clearly.

    • Be able to compare all professors in the course. No limits on that

    • Display over grade score and overall course evaluation score.

    • Use can easily understand how many passed/failed in the course.

    • Use can easily understand the teaching style and interest level of prof. in a detailed manner through course evaluations.

    • Implement filtering options for users to narrow down their selections for viewing the grade distributions in a better way based on specific criteria such as from- to for semesters.

    • Implement filtering options for users to narrow down their selections for viewing the course evaluation distributions in a better way based on specific criteria such as from- to for semesters.

    • General Coursebook information - user can easily view the syllabus contents in a single page and can have access to amount of assignments, exams, grading style and other information.

  • UX:

    • Ensure the dashboard is responsive and user-friendly on both desktop and mobile devices.

    • Design clear and intuitive visualizations to present the data effectively.

...