Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

\uD83D\uDDE3 Discussion topics

Item

Notes

Trends Thoughts

Plan for UTDGrades

Our Plan for UTDGrades

Data Access

  • Transitioning/ off-boarding

Partnership
  • good thoughts

  • good comparison and data, especially RMP integration

  • aggregated data may not make sense

    • recent filter would be good, on by default

  • drawn to RHS, but LHS is more important

    • idea is a redesign to remove RHS, and focus on LHS. move RHS to a smaller area or separate page

  • planner

    • degree plan validation went down

  • domain stuff

    • cloudflare goated

  • grades come from FOIA, about $10-$15

    • only because its been filed in the past

    • otherwise they say it costs 8.5k

  • some data in the CSV doesn’t exist in coursebook, specifically the section numbers

  • wtf is up with Jason Smith, bro must have reported everyone for academic honesty of smth

  • change sort icon to small bar, medium bar, large bar, then it swaps, instead of arrow

Plan for UTDGrades

  • maintenance

  • talking with development team

    • likely second iteration on utd grades

      • professor evaluations could be implemented

  • acm dev team does mostly what they want, maintains tools, works on new stuff

    • acm portal

    • hack portal, used by other hackathons

    • acm website

    • utd grades

  • value is helping students

  • wanted to keep utd grades simple and let nebula make something mroe complex

Transition grades to nebula

  • ACM needs to talk with officer board and dev team

  • plan could be

    • redirect

    • banner

    • maintenance

  • acm dev team still needs work

    • not resistant tho

  • competition

    • could be good

    • not a great dynamic tho

  • planner thing

Partnership

  • JSOM clubs

Sage

  • Discovery

Next Steps

  • ACM talks with officer board and dev team

⤴ Decisions

    ✅ Action items

    •